ADDIE Training Model: Everything You Need to Know
Want to train employees but don’t know where to begin? Learn about the proven ADDIE training model here and make your employees more productive and satisfied.
Want to train employees but don’t know where to begin? Learn about the proven ADDIE training model here and make your employees more productive and satisfied.
Every organization wants its employees to be fully productive to generate more revenues. They focus significantly on training employees to overcome weaknesses and achieve their full potential.
Organizations use various training models, including the famous ADDIE training model. Although critics have declared it outdated, slow, and even dead in some instances, ADDIE has held its value.
So, what is the ADDIE training model? How does it work? What are its pros and cons? How does it compare to other popular training models? Let’s answer these crucial questions.
ADDIE training model is based on five steps, represented by the alphabet in its name:
ADDIE offers a structured and streamlined approach to your training program, whether you want to train people online or offline or through blended learning strategies.
ADDIE was first developed for the US military in the 1970s at Florida State University. Since its launch, it has been the basis of training courses and has been adopted by several sectors over the years. If we observe its history, ADDIE has its roots in systems thinking. US military trainers like Robert Gagné and Robert Glaser were the first to apply systems thinking and develop a more refined training approach.
It is crucial to chart the evolution of the ADDIE training model to understand where it stands today and how trainers use it.
The original ADDIE model was linear, in which each phase informed the next one to form a sequence. It was a state-of-the-art model developed for military training and intended to train a homogenous group of learners for highly specific jobs. Since behavioral learning was pretty popular in those days, behavioral scholars suggested that these instructions would be useful even without educating trainees on the theories behind them.
For what it was, the original ADDIE training model was a remarkable success in the military and industrial context.
Rapid technological advances in the late 20th century made job requirements more complex. The instructional environment also significantly shifted, thanks to new instructional technologies and development tools. All of that stretched the capabilities of the original ADDIE training model, which needed modifications to fit in a modern context.
Training experts tweaked the original model to make it more dynamic and useful. For instance, instead of relegating evaluation to the final process, they made it a crucial part of each step. The next step can only be started once the previous step has been completed and evaluated.
Similarly, the modified ADDIE models focus on simplicity and flexibility, making it easier for instructional design experts of various levels of expertise to understand and implement them. Today, it is used by organizations for product knowledge training, compliance training, onboarding training, and whatnot.
Around 40% of organizations have increased their training budgets in the US, which shows us how crucial it is. Equally important is doing it the right way, which we’ll explain.
As we already know, ADDIE is a five-step process in which each step is in a well-defined order. Let’s find out what these ADDIE process steps are and how they work.
Goal: At the end of this phase, you will know if training is needed. If yes, you’ll have to understand training needs and have developed a training plan.
Before you start using the ADDIE methodology, it is crucial to gather information upfront to determine whether training will solve your problem or be part of the overall solution.
For that, you need to perform a thorough training needs assessment, which involves identifying the performance gap or problem that needs addressing. Most importantly, it tells you whether the training is necessary and whether it would resolve the problem.
For instance, if an employee frequently makes mistakes, it could be attributed to their lack of knowledge or skills. In that case, training is indeed a viable solution. However, training won't achieve much if the problem occurs due to faulty equipment or poorly designed processes. What it means is that training is practical when you are dealing primarily with human error.
Once you have determined that training is necessary, the analysis continues with the following elements:
Make sure you perform a foolproof analysis because all the following steps and the success of the ADDIE training model implementation depend upon it.
Goal: At the end of the design phase, you will have storyboards, prototypes, and detailed structure.
The second phase or stage of the ADDIE framework execution is Design, which strictly means instructional design, not visual or graphic design. This phase is all about crafting instructions based on the analysis you have already performed.
During the design phase, you rely heavily on subject-matter experts (SMEs) to understand the content that needs to be covered in training. SMEs are people with deep expertise in the subject and the topics being taught. Their insights make training material accurate, useful, and up-to-date. Based on the information from SMEs, you shall develop lesson plans and training content.
The choice of the training medium will determine the output of the design phase. For instance, if you create online training materials, the output will be scripts, storyboards, and interactive elements. On the other hand, you might develop handouts and participant workbooks for in-person sessions.
Here are a few key factors to consider during the design phase of the ADDIE training model:
Goal: At the end of the development phase, you will have the final training materials ready for implementation.
The development phase of the ADDIE training model involves finalizing the instructions from the design and tailoring them for the end user.
Following are a few examples:
When finalizing the contents from the design process, you’ll need to gather assets from multiple sources, including raw text, audio, images, video, and more. What you use depends upon the kind of course you are developing, but the development phase is what finalizes your training course.
Today, organizations use AI-powered tools to aid their development process, saving time and money. Similarly, virtual reality (VR) training adoption has seen a 60% increase.
Goal: This stage aims to make learning materials available to employees.
So, what is ADDIE implementation? It means taking to the audience what you have designed and developed. If you have developed an e-learning course, it means uploading it to the LMS, notifying them about the availability of the training course, and enrolling them through a simple process.
Suppose you have developed a face-to-face session or virtual webinar instead. In that case, it involves picking a suitable time for employees to attend the sessions together and a trainer to lead them. Usually, organizations have staff trainers to implement the learning experience and guide employees.
For a smaller organization, LMS implementation is no big deal. As we move up the ladder, courses become more complex with more employees attending them. That can be easily handled with an AI-powered system that manages everything efficiently and answers questions 24/7. Today, 40% of Fortune 500 companies use LMS to stay ahead of the competition, which shows its effectiveness in training employees.
Goal: The goal of evaluation is to know if the training is bearing the intended results.
The last part of the ADDIE training process is evaluation. One of the most crucial questions for any organization is: how to evaluate the effectiveness of a training program? That is where this phase comes in handy, measuring your course's effectiveness and usefulness on multiple levels.
It involves the following:
It is estimated that organizations that work on strength intervention earn 14-29% more profits than organizations that do not. Let’s suppose an organization wants to give product training to its sales team. Here is what different phases of the ADDIE model sample would look like:
Determine the specific product knowledge and sales skills required for the sales team, identify knowledge gaps, and gather feedback from sales representatives.
Develop a training program that covers product features, benefits, and selling techniques. Consider using role-playing exercises and simulations to enhance learning.
Create training materials, such as product catalogs, sales scripts, and online training modules.
Deliver the training program, provide ongoing support and coaching, and evaluate sales representatives' performance.
Measure the impact of the training on sales revenue, customer satisfaction, and employee performance.
Let’s look at another example where an organization wants to offer compliance training to employees. Here’s how the ADDIE instructional design will work in this case:
Identify specific compliance requirements and risks, assess current compliance knowledge, and gather employee feedback.
Develop a training program that covers relevant regulations, policies, and procedures.
Create training materials, such as compliance manuals, online modules, and quizzes.
Deliver the training program, provide ongoing updates and reminders, and evaluate employee understanding and compliance.
Measure compliance rates, identify areas for improvement, and track employee participation in training.
These ADDIE examples will help you understand how the model is applied in various situations.
ADDIE is a comprehensive model for instructional design that has served organizations for several decades, but it is also crucial to recognize its strengths and weaknesses.
The table below shows a detailed comparison of ADDIE with other popular training models. Choosing one or the other depends upon the timeline, scope, and resources required for a specific project.
For instance, ADDIE design model is preferable where the organization has clear objectives, whereas SAM (Successive Approximation Model) is ideal for environments that require swift adaptability and development. `
Feature
ADDIE
SAM
Kemp Design Model
Dick and Carey
Gagne’s Nine Events of Instructions
Purpose
Comprehensive instructional design model
Agile approach to instructional design
Instructional design model with a focus on learner-centeredness
A model focusing on interrelated phases in instructional design
Crafted around nine instructional events that correspond to cognitive processes
Steps
Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation
Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Reflect
Needs assessment, instructional objectives, instructional strategies, instructional materials, evaluation
Identify goals, needs analysis, objectives, strategies, materials, pilot, revise, finalize, implement, evaluate
Attention, perception, encoding, retrieval, generalization, guidance, practice, feedback, and testing
Focus
A systematic and structured approach
Iterative and flexible approach
Learner-centered approach, focus on instructional strategies
Comprehensive approach with a focus on instructional materials
Cognitive learning theory, attention, perception, and memory
Best Suited for
Large-scale training projects with defined objectives
Rapid development and iteration
Training programs that prioritize learner engagement and motivation
Educational settings and corporate training programs
Training programs that aim to enhance cognitive learning
Advantages
Clear framework, structured approach, comprehensive evaluation
Flexibility, adaptability, continuous improvement
Learner-centered approach, focus on strategies, adaptable
Comprehensive approach, focus on materials, clear steps
Focus on cognitive processes, effective for knowledge-based training
Disadvantages
Time-consuming, linear process, less adaptable
It can be challenging to maintain focus and requires strong project management.
May require additional resources for learner analysis, less comprehensive evaluation
It can be time-consuming and may require significant resources.
May be less effective for skill-based training and requires careful planning
Commonly Used In
Corporate training, educational institutions
Technology-driven training, rapid prototyping
Educational settings, corporate training programs
Corporate training programs
Educational and corporate training
Around 59% of employees say they have never had workplace training, which results in performance deficiencies and ultimately leads to organizations falling behind their competitors.
Thanks to technological advances, training your employees based on the ADDIE training model has become much more seamless and engaging. You can definitely jump ahead of the competition by using quality tools.
With an AI-powered tool like Coursebox, you can train your employees in a much more refined and engaging manner. Since design and evaluation are the fundamental aspects of any ADDIE-based training, Coursebox has an AI assistant to help you structure the course. There is also an AI Quiz Generator that creates relevant questions and an AI assessment tool.
So, start using one of the best AI tools for personalized learning and create the desired courses. Try now!
The 5 stages of ADDIE are Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. These are followed in the same order, although every step these days requires evaluation.
The assessment or evaluation stage of the ADDIE process is all about determining if the training is bearing the desired results and if the employee performance is improving.
The ADDIE framework is designed to help organizations train their employees in a structured manner. It starts with an analysis and ends with the evaluation of all the training steps.
Yes, the ADDIE model instructional design is still pretty relevant and used by several organizations. It is a comprehensive model refined and reiterated over several decades, resulting in a framework that can benefit any organization.
To apply the ADDIE training model, one must start with the analysis step to understand if the training is even required. Then the course is designed, developed, and implemented. Finally, a thorough evaluation is performed to see if training is actually working.